top of page
Writer's pictureAlpesh Patel

The Case Against 'Buy British': A Better Path for UK Pensioners

The recent headlines highlight a growing concern for the UK’s pension sector. British Business Bank has suggested that pension tax breaks might be clawed back if funds fail to allocate sufficient capital domestically. But this raises a crucial question: is this in the best interest of UK pensioners?



The answer is a resounding no. This debate isn’t just about fund managers or tax reliefs; it’s about the real value pensioners derive from their hard-earned savings. Pensioners deserve access to the best investment opportunities globally, not limited by geographical biases or politically motivated investment strategies.

Investing Abroad: A Better Alternative for UK Pensioners

The UK pension system offers powerful tools for individual investors, such as SIPPs (Self-Invested Personal Pensions) and ISAs (Individual Savings Accounts), which allow for tax-free growth and withdrawals.


These vehicles empower pensioners to look beyond UK borders and allocate their savings to global markets, where the returns are often far superior.


This strategy isn't short-term thinking. In my very first column for the Financial Times in 1999, I argued the case for investing in U.S. stocks over UK ones. Why? Because the U.S. market consistently delivered better returns, driven by a combination of innovative companies, a strong entrepreneurial culture, and a huge market. Fast-forward 25 years, and the evidence is even more compelling.

U.S. equity markets, led by the likes of the S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq, have outperformed the FTSE 100 in almost every rolling period over the past two decades.

Add to this the rise of emerging markets, where burgeoning economies offer growth rates that the UK simply cannot match, and the argument becomes even stronger. For UK pensioners, investing abroad isn’t just an option; it’s a necessity for maximising long-term returns.

Why "Home Bias" Hurts Pensioners

The pressure to "buy British" is nothing new, but it often leads to suboptimal outcomes. This “home bias” in investment is a well-documented phenomenon where individuals or institutions over allocate to domestic assets, even when global options offer better returns. In the case of UK pension funds, this bias can result in missed opportunities and

diminished retirement wealth.

Moreover, the Government’s focus on domestic investment for tax relief purposes is misguided. Pensioners spending their tax-free withdrawals in the UK, whether earned domestically or abroad, ultimately benefit the UK economy. Whether the income comes from dividends on Apple stock or BP shares is irrelevant—what matters is how the wealth is utilised, not where it was generated.

The Real Agenda of Fund Managers

At the heart of this issue is the fund management industry itself. By lobbying for stricter domestic investment requirements, fund managers seek to safeguard their fee structures and AUM (Assets Under Management). However, these motives rarely align with the best interests of pensioners. While fund managers collect their management fees, pensioners bear the brunt of poor returns from underperforming domestic assets.

The rise of low-cost index funds and ETFs has further exposed the inefficiencies of traditional fund managers. Investors are now more aware that paying high fees for mediocre returns is a losing game. Platforms like SIPPs and ISAs allow pensioners to bypass these intermediaries entirely and take control of their financial futures.

Empowering Pensioners to Take Control

The solution is simple: educate pensioners about their investment options and empower them to make informed decisions. The tools are already available.

It’s time to stop perpetuating the myth that investing abroad is somehow unpatriotic or detrimental to the UK. On the contrary, a wealthier retired population benefits the UK economy through increased spending and reduced dependence on state benefits.

The Bigger Picture



The Government must recognise that aligning pension investment strategies with fund managers' interests does not serve the broader public. Instead, policymakers should focus on encouraging financial literacy and providing transparent, unbiased information to pensioners.

As I argued in 1999, the world is too interconnected to limit one’s financial future to national borders. The tools, technology, and knowledge are at our fingertips to invest globally and achieve better outcomes. The time has come to embrace these opportunities and ensure that pensioners' interests are put first—where they belong.


Alpesh Patel OBE



Disclaimer: The content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The opinions expressed here are the author's own and do not reflect the views of any associated companies. Investing in financial markets involves risk, including the potential loss of your invested capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 


You should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Mentions of specific securities, investment strategies, or financial products do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation. The author may hold positions in the securities discussed, but these should not be viewed as personalised investment advice. 


Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and seek professional advice before acting on any information provided in this blog. The author is not responsible for any investment decisions made based on the content of this blog.

Comments


bottom of page