.png)
20% annualised volatility means the stock’s annual returns tend to fluctuate within a range of ±20% (one standard deviation) from the average in a typical year. In other words, it’s a statistical measure of how “wide” the dispersion of returns is.
Below, we break down what 20% volatility implies mathematically, provide a real-world analogy, and examine historical examples, extreme cases, frequency of large moves, and what this means for investors in terms of risk management.
1. Mathematical Explanation: From Annual to Daily and Monthly Volatility
Volatility corresponds to the width of the distribution of returns. A 20% annual volatility implies that most yearly returns will fall within a band around the average (mean) return, as illustrated by the bell curve above.
In a normal distribution, about 68% of outcomes lie within one standard deviation (±1σ) of the mean, ~95% lie within ±2σ, and ~99.7% within ±3σ. Volatility is the standard deviation of returns – it doesn’t tell us the direction of returns, just the degree of variation.
Annual Volatility (20%) – If a stock’s price is $100, one standard deviation for the year is ±$20. This means about a 68% chance the ending price after one year will be between $80 and $120 (within ±20%).
There’s roughly a 95% probability it ends between $60 and $140 (±40%, two standard deviations). In statistical terms, a 20% annualized σ implies most annual returns cluster in a range of about –20% to +20% around the mean in normal conditions.
Extreme outliers (three standard deviations or ~60% moves) are statistically rare (~0.3% probability if returns were perfectly normal). However, real markets have “fat tails,” meaning extreme moves happen slightly more often than a perfect normal distribution would predict.
Monthly Volatility – To find volatility over shorter periods, we scale by the square root of time. For one month, 20% annual volatility translates to about 5.77% per month (20% / √12 ≈ 5.77%).
Using the $100 stock example, a one-standard-deviation move in a month is about ±$5.77, so about 68% of the time monthly returns would fall in the range –5.77% to +5.77%.
A two-standard-deviation month (~±11.5%) is rarer (~5% probability). In practical terms, a single month might typically see the stock move up or down by only a few percent, but a very bad month could see on the order of a 10% drop (2σ event), given 20% annual volatility.
Daily Volatility – There are roughly 252 trading days in a year, so daily volatility would be ~20%/√252 ≈ 1.25% per day. This implies on most trading days the stock might only move about ±1% or so.
A one-day move of ±2.5% would be about a 2σ daily event (roughly 5% probability in a normal distribution, meaning about 1 out of 20 trading days) – so we’d expect a few 2%–3% daily moves in a typical year.
A 5% one-day move is ~4 standard deviations relative to a 1.25% daily sigma; under a normal bell curve that’s extremely unlikely (<0.01% chance on a given day), but as we’ll see, real markets occasionally experience such jumps during turmoil.
Expected Returns vs. Volatility – It’s important to note that volatility is not the same as expected return. A stock could have an expected annual return (mean) of, say, +8%, but with 20% volatility the actual outcome in any given year will likely deviate significantly from +8%.
For instance, one year might be +30%, another year –15%, etc., and these variations around the average are captured by the ~20% standard deviation. If we assume an expected return ~0% for simplicity, a 20% volatility means about a 2.3% probability of being worse than –40% in a year (since –40% is 2σ below the mean), and similarly a ~2.3% chance of more than +40%.
In reality, stock returns are not perfectly normal – extreme moves occur a bit more frequently than the theoretical odds.
Bottom line: 20% annual volatility implies a moderate level of fluctuation. In an “average” year, you might expect the stock’s return to fall somewhere within ±20% around its mean more often than not.
On a daily basis, ±1% moves are routine, and on a monthly basis, ±5% swings are common. Larger deviations (e.g. a +20% year or –20% year) do happen but are progressively less frequent the more extreme they get.
2. Real-World Analogy: Intuiting Volatility
To build intuition, consider an analogy: Volatility as a “Bumpy Ride”: Think of the stock’s price as a car on a road trip. The average speed of the car corresponds to the stock’s expected return, and volatility is like the variability in the car’s speed due to road conditions.
Low volatility is a smooth highway – the car stays near 60 mph consistently with only small speed changes. High volatility is a rough, twisty road – sometimes you’re zooming at 80 mph, other times slamming the brakes to 40 mph.
20% volatility would be a moderately bumpy journey: most of the time you travel at roughly your usual speed (within about ±20% of it), but you’ll frequently slow down or speed up noticeably.
There might be occasional “white-knuckle” moments (extreme volatility) where conditions force a very sharp slowdown (analogous to a market crash or big drop), or an unexpected surge (a big rally).
Another analogy: A dog on a leash. Imagine the stock’s long-term trend is the path of the dog’s owner, and volatility is how far the dog wanders from the owner while walking.
A well-behaved, calm dog (low volatility) stays close to the owner’s side, straying only a little. A hyperactive dog with a long leash (high volatility) darts around in all directions – sometimes far ahead, sometimes lagging behind or veering sideways.
If volatility is 20%, the “dog” (price) is on a moderately long leash: it usually stays within a certain distance of the trend, but it has enough leeway to occasionally run off quite far before coming back.
Implications: In both analogies, the destination (or the owner’s general direction) might be unchanged, but higher volatility means a less predictable, more erratic journey to get there. Investors need to be prepared for those twists and turns.
These analogies underscore that volatility = variability. A stock with 20% volatility isn’t steadily rising 20% each year; rather, it’s bouncing around – sometimes up, sometimes down – with a typical magnitude of 20% around its average trajectory. Understanding this helps investors mentally prepare for the level of “choppiness” in the price.
3. Historical Examples of 20% Volatility
Market Indices: A 20% annualised volatility is in the ballpark of long-term stock market volatility. For example, the S&P 500’s historical volatility has averaged around 15% annually in recent decades, often lower in calm periods and higher in turbulent times.
Periodically it does approach or exceed 20%. The FTSE 100 (UK stock index) shows a similar pattern – roughly mid-teens volatility on average. From 2000–2024, the FTSE 100’s standard deviation of annual returns was about 14.7%, but in more volatile episodes it climbed closer to the 20% range. So 20% volatility is a realistic, moderate risk level for a broad equity index.
S&P 500 – “Normal” vs. Volatile Years: In typical years, the S&P might return, say, +10% with a volatility around the mid-teens. But in volatile years, realised volatility can shoot well above 20%. For instance, in 2008, the S&P 500 plunged 38% for the year, one of its worst annual performances on record.
This was far outside the ±20% band – essentially a ~2-sigma downside event under a 20% volatility assumption. Not surprisingly, actual volatility spiked dramatically during the 2008 financial crisis: the VIX (a market volatility index) hit levels around 80 (implying ~80% annualised volatility expectations at the peak of panic).
By contrast, 2017 was an exceptionally calm year with S&P volatility around 10% or less (the index rose ~19% that year with very few big swings). These examples show that realised volatility itself varies year to year: 20% is an average ballpark, but actual markets have both quieter and more explosive periods.
FTSE 100 – Crashes and Calm Periods: The UK’s FTSE 100 likewise has seen years of extreme volatility. A famous example is Black Monday 1987: on October 19, 1987, the FTSE 100 plummeted –10.8% in one day, followed by another –12.2% drop the next day. Over those two days, the index lost about 22% of its value – an extraordinarily rare and volatile swing (far beyond what 20% annual volatility would suggest for a single week!).
Yet, despite that crash, the FTSE recovered in subsequent years. More recently, during the COVID-19 panic in March 2020, the FTSE 100 (along with other indices) saw volatility surge: the index fell roughly 25–30% in a matter of weeks and had many days with +/-5% moves.
Such episodes greatly exceed “normal” volatility in the short term, but they illustrate the spikes that can occur. Outside of crashes, the FTSE often experiences annual volatility in the teens.
For example, between late 2021 and early 2022, the 60-day trailing volatility of the FTSE 100 fell into single digits as markets were calm, whereas in early 2020 it was extremely high.
Key point: an index like FTSE 100 usually operates in a volatility regime near our 20% mark, but can swing from very low to very high volatility depending on market conditions.
Individual Stocks: Many large-cap individual stocks have long-run volatilities in the 15–25% range, comparable to ~20%. For instance, as of early 2025, Apple Inc. (AAPL), one of the world’s largest companies, has a realised volatility around 19.6%. This means Apple’s stock typically fluctuated ~20% annualised – a level consistent with a mature but still somewhat volatile equity.
Another example: Coca-Cola (KO), a very stable consumer staples stock, has implied volatility around 15–17% most of the time, a bit lower than 20%, whereas a more cyclical stock might be higher.
It’s worth noting that 20% is moderate in the stock world – some high-growth or speculative stocks regularly exhibit volatility well above 30–40% (e.g., a stock like Tesla often had volatility >50% in certain years), while very defensive stocks or utilities might be below 15%.
Notable High-Volatility Periods: Even stocks or indices that average ~20% vol can experience transient spikes. Besides 2008 (global crisis) and early 2020 (pandemic crash), other historical moments of extreme volatility include the Dot-Com Bust (2000–2002) – the Nasdaq index (tech-heavy) saw volatility skyrocket and the Nasdaq Composite fell ~78% peak-to-trough while the S&P 500 dropped ~50% over that bear market.
The Great Depression era (1929–1932) was even more volatile: the Dow Jones had stretches of volatility well over 50% and saw annual declines over 40% multiple times. These are outliers in history, but they show the upper extremes of stock volatility.
By contrast, there have also been periods of eerie calm (e.g., 2017 as mentioned, or mid-1960s) where volatility is exceptionally low. A 20% volatility is somewhere in between – neither a tranquil low-volatility period nor a panic, but rather an ordinary level of market choppiness consistent with many historical norms.
In summary, 20% volatility is close to what broad equity markets often experience. It’s high enough to include noticeable swings (market corrections and rallies), but not an extreme outlier level. Many well-known indices and stocks have operated around this volatility level, though specific years can be much higher or lower.
4. Worst-Case Scenarios: Probability of Extreme Drops
Investors are often especially concerned with extreme negative returns – for example, how likely is a 40% drop in a year if volatility is ~20%? Statistically, a –40% one-year return is 2 standard deviations below the mean (if we assume the mean ~0 for simplicity).
Under a normal distribution, a ≥2σ downside event has a probability of about 2.3% (approximately once every 40 years). In other words, in theory a 20% volatility implies that a year as bad as –40% is quite rare. However, markets are not perfectly normal and history suggests extreme drops occur a bit more frequently than the idealised odds:
Historical Frequency of ~40% Declines: Looking at the S&P 500’s history, one-year drops of ~40% have indeed been infrequent but not unheard of. The 2008 financial crisis saw the S&P 500 down about –38.5% for the year.
During the Great Depression, 1931 recorded an annual drop of roughly –44%, and 1937 saw around –38%. In 1973–74, the market fell in two consecutive years for a combined drop of nearly 50%, with around –30% in 1974 alone.
In the 2000–2002 bear market, the S&P 500 declined roughly 50% from peak to trough, though that was spread over three years (the worst single calendar year was 2002 at –22%).
So, a 40%+ decline in one calendar year is very rare (the only clear case in the last 50+ years was 2008, and before that you go back to the 1930s). But, if we broaden to peak-to-trough drawdowns, we have seen multiple ~40–50% collapses (1973–74, 2000–02, 2007–09).
Conclusion: Based on history, a ~30–40% bear market tends to happen on the order of once every decade or two (and deeper 50% crashes perhaps once in a generation), which is roughly in line with the probability estimates of a 20% vol model (a 30% crash is a ~1.5σ–2σ event; a 50% crash is ~2.5σ).
Distribution “Fat Tails”: It’s important to note that actual stock return distributions have fat tails, meaning the odds of extreme moves are higher than the pure normal curve predicts.
For example, a –20% single-day crash like Black Monday 1987 is essentially a 10+σ event under a 1.25% daily volatility assumption – statistically “impossible” in a normal distribution – yet it occurred.
Similarly, the 2008 crisis had multiple 3σ–5σ daily moves in a short span. This indicates real worst-case scenarios can be more frequent than a naive model might suggest.
As volatility rises in a crisis, the probability of extreme moves also rises because volatility itself is not static – it tends to spike during market stress (the 20% assumption might blow out to 40% or more in the midst of a crash, making large drops more probable in those moments).
Scenario Analysis: If we assume 20% vol and a modest positive expected return (say 5–10%), the likeliest outcomes cluster around that (e.g. maybe a +10% year ±20%).
But risk management requires contemplating the worst cases: a 3σ negative year (–60% or worse) would be catastrophic but exceedingly unlikely (<0.3% chance under normal assumptions; historically, the stock market has never fallen 60% in one calendar year, though the total drawdown in 1929–32 was over 80% cumulatively).
A 2σ negative year (–40% or a bit more) has a few historical precedents as noted. Hence investors often plan for something like a “1-in-20 or 1-in-50 year” bad outcome where you could lose on the order of one-third to half your equity value – not expected in a normal year, but possible over a long horizon.
Stress Periods: It can also be useful to look at intra-year worst cases. For example, in early 2020 the S&P 500 dropped 34% in just 33 days during the COVID crash – an extremely fast bear market. If one was only looking at annual volatility, 2020’s full-year return (S&P ended 2020 roughly +16%) belies the extreme swing within the year.
The lesson is that worst-case scenarios often unfold over short, intense bursts of volatility. A 20% annual volatility environment can suddenly morph into a temporary 50%+ volatility spike during a crisis, enabling those tail events.
In summary, with 20% vol one might expect routine ups and downs, but plan for the occasional brutal downturn. Based on probability, a –40% yearly drop might be expected roughly once in decades under normal conditions, and that aligns with historical observation (e.g. 1974 and 2008 were on that order in roughly 30-year span).
Truly worst-case multi-decade events (like Great Depression-level losses) exceed the 20% volatility model entirely – those are outliers where volatility spiked far beyond 20% during the event. The takeaway: extreme negative scenarios are rare, but not impossible, and volatility gives a framework to gauge their odds.
5. Frequency of Large Moves
Investors often ask, “How often will I see really big moves with 20% volatility?” We can use both statistical reasoning and historical data to answer for different magnitudes (say 5%, 10%, 20% changes) over different time frames:
Daily Moves: With daily volatility ~1.25%, a 1% day is not unusual at all (within 1σ). A 2–3% daily change is around 2σ, which under normal assumptions might occur a few times a year.
Indeed, historically the S&P 500 has frequently had a handful of days each year where it rises or falls in the ~2–3% range (often around earnings news or macro events). 5%+ daily swings are much rarer.
Under a static 1.25% daily sigma, a 5% move is ~4σ (which would be expected only once in tens of thousands of days). Yet in reality, 5% days do happen during turmoil: in October 2008, for example, the S&P moved ±5% or more in a single day on multiple occasions, and in the fourth quarter of 2008 there were 29 trading days where the index moved 3% or more up or down in a day.
In March 2020, the S&P had several days beyond ±5%, including a nearly –12% drop on March 16, 2020 (an extreme outlier corresponding to ~10σ if volatility were still 1.25%—of course actual volatility had spiked far above normal by then).
Bottom line: In a typical year, you might not see a 5% daily move at all, or maybe only once. But in a high-volatility year, expect numerous large daily swings. 10% in one day is extraordinarily rare (only 1987’s crash saw –22% in a day for the Dow, and +11% in a day was the S&P’s record gain on Oct 13, 2008). So don’t expect 10% days in a 20% vol regime except in the most extreme crises.
Monthly Moves: With ~5.8% monthly volatility, a 5% move in a month is around a 0.86σ event – quite routine. In fact, it would be unusual not to have a single month in a year where the market is up or down 5% or more.
A 10% move in a month is ~1.7σ (roughly a 9–10% probability in any given month if normal). Historically, U.S. stocks have seen 10%+ monthly changes fairly often, especially around market inflection points.
For example, October 2008 saw the S&P 500 fall about –17% in one month, and then April 2020 saw a +12% monthly gain as the market rebounded. It’s common to get a double-digit percentage decline or rally within a calendar year (during panic or recovery phases). 20% in a single month would be around 3.5σ (very rare normally).
We have seen a few ~20% months in extreme cases (e.g., the Dow was down 23% in September 1931; up 21% in April 1933; more recently, nothing quite 20% in a month for the S&P, though March 2020 was ~–12%, and April 2020 +12%).
So, under 20% annual volatility, expect 5% months regularly, 10% months occasionally (perhaps 1–2 per year, often clustered in volatile periods), and 20% months only in extraordinary situations.
Annual Moves: With 20% as the one-year σ, about 1 in 3 years should see a double-digit percentage move up or down beyond 20% (since >1σ happens ~32% of the time in either tail). In fact, the historical record shows that exactly hitting the long-term average is rare – returns tend to be either well above or well below average in a given year.
From 1998 to 2022, for example, the S&P 500’s yearly returns ranged from +32% at the high end to –37% at the low end, and only a couple of years had single-digit gains or losses.
So 20%+ gains or losses in a year are not unusual. On average (since 1950), the S&P has a 10%+ correction about every 2 years, and a 20%+ bear market roughly every 7 years.
This means investors should expect significant swings fairly regularly.
A +20% or more up-year happens quite frequently (bull markets often produce years +20% or +30%).
A –20% or worse down-year (bear market year) historically has occurred roughly ~15% of years (e.g., 9 down years >20% for the S&P in the last ~60–70 years). In a 20% volatility regime, a –20% year is a 1σ event (about 16% chance), which aligns well with history.
To put it plainly: Investors should be mentally prepared for ~10% corrections at least every couple of years, 20% bear markets every decade or so, and occasional larger crashes. Day-to-day, 1–2% moves are part of the normal noise, and a 4–5% daily jump, while rare, can occur in extreme moments.
This level of volatility also implies that intra-year volatility is the norm – even in years that end up with modest returns, it’s common to experience a significant mid-year drawdown. (In fact, the average peak-to-trough intra-year drawdown for the S&P since 1950 is around 13%, meaning most years had at least one 10% dip at some point during the year.)
The 20% volatility figure provides a statistical framework: roughly two years out of three, the market won’t deviate more than about 20% from its trend, but that third year (or during crises) you will see those larger swings.
6. Risk Management Implications
A 20% volatility level has important implications for portfolio construction and risk management. Here are key considerations:
Expect Drawdowns: With this volatility, an investor should expect that at some point their portfolio (if fully in stocks) could be down on the order of 20% from a peak, and in worse scenarios 30–40%.
Risk management means not being surprised by this and ensuring such a drop is something you can financially and psychologically withstand. If a 20% decline in your holdings would derail your goals or cause panic selling, you may need to reduce exposure (e.g. include bonds or other lower-volatility assets to dampen overall portfolio volatility).
Diversification: Building a portfolio with multiple asset classes can reduce overall volatility. Stocks with 20% vol can be paired with bonds (which are typically less volatile) or other assets that don’t move in perfect lockstep.
Diversification spreads risk so that a 20% volatility in one asset doesn’t translate to 20% volatility for the whole portfolio if other assets behave differently. The principle is that unless all assets are perfectly correlated, mixing them will lower the combined volatility.
For example, a 60/40 stock-bond portfolio historically has had volatility significantly lower than pure equities (perhaps in the ~10–12% range, depending on bond volatility), which smooths out the ride.
Even diversifying across many stocks (holding an index fund rather than a few individual stocks) helps because the idiosyncratic ups and downs average out. In short, 20% vol for one stock can be managed by not putting all your eggs in that one basket.
Allocation and Time Horizon: Investors should align their asset allocation with their risk tolerance given a 20% vol environment. Younger investors with long horizons might accept 20% volatility (or even higher) in exchange for higher expected returns, knowing they have time to recover from downturns.
Older investors near retirement often dial down volatility exposure (shifting to more bonds/cash) because a 20%+ drop at the wrong time can be harmful when withdrawals are needed.
Time horizon matters: over long periods, the impact of volatility is softened by eventual recovery (historically, markets have always recovered and reached new highs after bear markets, given enough time).
“Time in the market, not timing the market” is a common adage – enduring volatility is the price for growth, and a long-term investor is typically rewarded for riding out the storms.
Thus, risk management doesn’t mean avoiding volatility (which is impossible in equities), but structuring your portfolio so that short-term volatility doesn’t force you into bad decisions.
Emotional Discipline: With a 20% volatile asset, one must be prepared for the emotional rollercoaster. Sudden drops can trigger fear. A sound risk management plan (such as setting appropriate stop-loss orders, or simply having a rules-based rebalancing approach) can prevent knee-jerk reactions.
For example, one strategy is to rebalance periodically: if stocks drop significantly (increasing the bond percentage of a balanced portfolio), rebalancing would have you buy stocks at lower prices, and vice versa.
This enforces buying low and selling high, taking advantage of volatility rather than falling victim to it. Volatility can also present opportunities – for instance, options strategies (like selling options) often become more lucrative when volatility is high, and long-term investors can add to positions at discounted prices during a volatile sell-off. But these approaches require discipline and understanding of one’s risk tolerance.
Risk Measures and Position Sizing: In practical portfolio management, one might use measures like Value at Risk (VaR) or stress tests to see what a 20% volatility implies for potential losses. For instance, a one-week 99% VaR might indicate how much one could lose in a very bad week.
Such analysis might reveal, say, that in a 20% vol regime there’s a 1% chance of losing 6%+ in a week, etc. This can guide position sizing (how big of a position to take in a volatile stock) so that even a worst-case swing doesn’t exceed what the portfolio (or the investor) can handle. If an investor holds a stock with 20% vol, they might size it smaller compared to a stock with 10% vol to equalise risk.
Stay Invested vs. Market Timing: Since volatility is inevitable, a key risk management insight is that trying to time the market to avoid volatility can backfire. Often, the best (most positive) days in the market occur in close proximity to the worst days.
Missing the major rebound days (which often happen during volatile times) can hurt long-term returns. Therefore, many advisors recommend maintaining exposure through the volatility rather than pulling out at the first sign of trouble.
As one perspective notes, short-term volatility is essentially impossible to predict consistently, so a long-term, diversified approach tends to make sense.
In conclusion, 20% annualised volatility paints a picture of a portfolio that will have a moderate level of fluctuation – not trivial, but also not unusual by stock market standards. Understanding it mathematically helps set expectations for daily, monthly, and yearly moves.
Recognising it in historical context shows that it’s a normal part of equity investing (with both calm and stormy episodes). And appreciating its implications allows investors to prepare and strategise: through diversification, aligning risk with goals, and maintaining discipline.
Volatility at ~20% is the price of admission for many stock investors – by comprehending it and respecting it, one can navigate the market’s ups and downs more confidently and effectively. But importantly it also means you can decide you’d like to be a 10% volatility investor too. And that is the most valuable lesson to learn - your risk or volatility capacity.
RISK WARNING: All investing is risky. Returns at not guaranteed. Past performance and case studies are no guarantee of future results.
Disclaimer: The content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The opinions expressed here are the author's own and do not reflect the views of any associated companies. Investing in financial markets involves risk, including the potential loss of your invested capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
You should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Mentions of specific securities, investment strategies, or financial products do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation. The author may hold positions in the securities discussed, but these should not be viewed as personalised investment advice.
Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and seek professional advice before acting on any information provided in this blog. The author is not responsible for any investment decisions made based on the content of this blog.
Alpesh Patel OBE
Visit www.alpeshpatel.com/shares for more and see www.alpeshpatel.com/links
Comments